Turn your data into apps
with Glide
We build powerful business apps with Glide, transforming spreadsheets and databases into polished web and mobile apps in days. Perfect for internal tools, portals, and data-driven workflows.
The best tool for
data-driven app builder
Glide turns your existing data, Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, or SQL, into beautiful apps for web and mobile. It's the fastest way to give your team a real app interface on top of data they already own.
What we build with Glide
From MVPs to enterprise platforms, here's how we use Glide to ship faster.
Internal Tools
Field apps, inspection checklists, inventory trackers, and ops tools built on your existing spreadsheet data.
Client Portals
Branded portals giving clients access to their data, documents, and project status, without sharing a spreadsheet.
Directory Apps
Team directories, supplier lists, and product catalogs with search, filters, and detail views.
Data Collection
Mobile-friendly forms that feed directly into Google Sheets or Airtable, for field teams and audits.
Certified Glide experts
We don't just use Glide, we master it. Our team is certified and has shipped dozens of projects with it.
Apps delivered
We've shipped over 50 production apps using Glide and the broader no-code stack, from seed-stage MVPs to enterprise platforms.
Faster delivery
Glide lets us build in weeks what traditional dev teams take months to deliver, giving you a decisive speed advantage.
Fixed pricing
Every project comes with a clear scope, fixed price, and weekly demos. No surprises, no scope creep, just results.
Tools we combine with Glide
We integrate Glide with the best tools in the no-code ecosystem for end-to-end solutions.
The Complete Guide to Glide Development
Glide transforms spreadsheets and databases into polished web and mobile apps without a single line of code.
Glide's Spreadsheet-First Approach: What It Means
Glide was built on a deceptively simple premise: most business data already lives in spreadsheets, so the fastest way to build an app is to start there. Instead of designing a schema from scratch, you connect an existing Google Sheet or Airtable base and Glide reads your columns as your data model. The result is an app that reflects the structure your team already understands. This approach collapses the gap between data owner and app builder. A non-technical operations manager can connect their tracker, map columns to UI components, and publish a working app in an afternoon. There is no separate database migration, no API layer to stand up, and no deployment pipeline to configure. The spreadsheet is the source of truth, and Glide keeps them in sync. The tradeoff is real but manageable. Spreadsheet-first means you inherit the limitations of your data source, row limits, formula complexity, and the flat structure of a grid. For most internal tools, portals, and directories those constraints rarely bite. For apps that need complex relational joins or high-frequency writes, you will want to evaluate Glide Tables or a dedicated SQL connection instead.
Glide Tables vs Google Sheets as Your Database
When you start a new Glide project today, you face an early architectural choice: use Glide Tables (Glide's native database) or connect to an external source like Google Sheets or Airtable. Glide Tables offer faster read and write performance, better support for large datasets, and tighter integration with Glide's computed columns. They are the right default for most new projects. Google Sheets remains the better choice when your data is already maintained in a sheet by people who are not the app builders, a finance team updating a budget tracker, or a ops lead managing a project list. In those cases, the sheet is the primary interface and the Glide app is a secondary consumption layer. Changing to Glide Tables would mean migrating ownership of the data and retraining those users. Airtable sits in the middle: it has a richer data model than Google Sheets (linked records, attachments, rollups) and connects to Glide well. If your team already runs operations in Airtable, connecting Glide on top adds an app interface with user auth and row-level permissions without duplicating your data. The key rule is simple, use Glide Tables for new data, use existing sources when the data already has a home.
Glide for Internal Tools: Roles and Permissions
Internal tools live and die by access control. Glide's user model lets you define who can see which rows, which screens, and which actions, based on the signed-in user's email, role, or any column value in your data. Row ownership filters ensure each user sees only the records that belong to them. Role-based visibility lets you build admin screens that employees never see. The most common pattern is a user table with an email column and a role column. Glide matches the signed-in email against that table and uses the role value to control visibility of tabs, components, and actions throughout the app. This single pattern covers the vast majority of internal tool access scenarios, new user, manager, and admin tiers each get a tailored experience from the same underlying app. Permissions in Glide are declarative, not programmatic. You set rules in the editor and Glide enforces them at runtime. There is no backend middleware to maintain. This is powerful for fast iteration but means you need to be deliberate: always test your permission logic with a real non-admin account before publishing. Glide's user simulation mode in the editor makes this straightforward.
Glide Integrations and Automations
Glide connects to the wider tool ecosystem through Zapier, Make, and its own native actions. From inside the Glide editor you can trigger HTTP requests, send emails via integrated providers, and fire webhooks on any button press or form submission. For most straightforward notification and sync workflows, native actions are enough and require no external automation account. For more complex multi-step automations, updating a CRM on form submission, generating a PDF and emailing it, or syncing data across multiple systems, Make (formerly Integromat) is the recommended companion. Make watches for changes in Glide's data source and chains actions across 1,500+ apps. The combination of Glide for the user-facing layer and Make for the workflow layer covers an enormous range of business use cases. Zapier works too and has a larger library of app connectors, but Make is better suited to the kind of conditional, multi-step logic that Glide apps typically need. If you are already paying for Make, use it. If you are starting fresh and your automations are simple, Glide's native actions may be all you need. The integration story is mature, Glide apps rarely hit a wall because a connector is missing.
Glide Pricing Tiers
Glide's pricing is structured around projects, users, and updates (data writes through the app). The free tier allows you to build and publish, but limits updates and users, useful for prototyping and personal projects, not suitable for business deployments. The Maker plan covers solo builders and small teams with moderate usage. Business and Enterprise tiers remove or raise limits on users, updates, and private apps. The updates metric is the one most likely to surprise first-time Glide users. Every time a user fills in a form, edits a row, or triggers an action that writes data, Glide counts an update. High-volume apps, daily form submissions from a large field team, for example, can burn through updates quickly on lower tiers. Model your expected write volume before committing to a plan. For agencies and developers building apps for clients, Glide's agency and reseller programs are worth investigating. They allow you to manage multiple client projects under one account and transfer projects to clients when work is complete. Pricing changes over time, so always check the current Glide pricing page, but the general structure of project-based and user-based limits has been stable.
Glide Limitations for Complex Apps
Glide is excellent for a well-defined category of apps and less suited to others. The clearest limitation is complexity of data relationships. Glide supports linked records and lookups, but it is not a full relational database. Apps that require deeply nested joins, complex aggregations across large datasets, or frequent transactional writes will strain Glide's architecture. At that point, a tool with a proper backend, WeWeb with Supabase, or a custom build, is the right answer. Custom UI is another constraint. Glide's component library is polished and growing, but you are working within its design system. Pixel-perfect custom layouts, complex animations, or highly branded interfaces that deviate significantly from Glide's patterns are difficult or impossible to achieve. If brand fidelity is the primary requirement, Webflow or WeWeb gives you more design control. Offline support, native device features (camera, GPS, push notifications), and iOS App Store distribution are areas where Glide has made progress but remains limited compared to native or React Native development. For apps that need to work without connectivity or deeply integrate with device hardware, evaluate FlutterFlow instead. The honest summary: Glide is one of the best tools ever made for its target use case. Know what that use case is and you will use it confidently.
How Glide compares
See how Glide stacks up against other popular tools.
Ready to build with Glide?
Book a free 30-minute call. We'll scope your project, answer your questions, and send you a fixed quote, no commitment required.
Book a free call →