Supabase vs Neon: Serverless Postgres Compared for 2026 (NL)
Supabase and Neon both offer serverless PostgreSQL. But they serve very different purposes in the no-code and startup stack.
Vergelijking: Supabase vs Neon
| Criterium | Supabase | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| Core Product | Full BaaS (DB + Auth + Storage + Edge) | Serverless PostgreSQL database only |
| Authentication | Built-in (email, OAuth, magic link) | None (bring your own) |
| Storage | S3-compatible file storage | None |
| Realtime | WebSocket subscriptions | None |
| Edge Functions | Deno-based edge functions | None |
| Branching | Not available | Database branching (unique feature) |
| WeWeb Integration | Native connector | Manual via PostgREST or Xano |
| Free Tier | 2 projects, 500MB DB | 10GB storage, unlimited projects |
Ons oordeel
Supabase is the complete backend platform. Auth, database, storage, realtime, edge functions — one tool handles it all. For no-code stacks (WeWeb, FlutterFlow), Supabase has native connectors that make integration trivial.
Neon is a pure database product with an innovative branching feature (like git branches, but for your DB schema). It's compelling for teams who want serverless Postgres with great DX — but need to bring their own auth, storage, and API layer.
For 95% of startup use cases, Supabase is the right choice. Neon is interesting for teams with specific database-branching workflows or existing auth infrastructure.
Hulp bij de keuze?
Onze experts hebben 50+ projecten gebouwd met deze tools.
Vraag advies aan