SB
vs
PS
Supabase vs PlanetScale: Which Serverless Database for 2026? (DE)
Supabase and PlanetScale both offer managed serverless databases. But they serve very different architectural needs.
Vergleich: Supabase vs PlanetScale
| Kriterium | Supabase | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Database Engine | PostgreSQL | MySQL (Vitess) |
| Auth | Built-in auth (email, OAuth, SSO) | None, bring your own |
| Realtime | WebSocket subscriptions | None |
| Storage | S3-compatible file storage | None |
| Branching | Not available | Database branching (standout feature) |
| No-Code Integration | Native (WeWeb, FlutterFlow) | Via external API/ORM only |
| Scale | To millions of rows | Designed for extreme horizontal scale |
| Free Tier | 500MB, 2 projects | 10GB, 1 database (discontinued free tier) |
Unser Urteil
Supabase
Better for full-stack apps
PlanetScale
Better for high-scale MySQL
Supabase gives you a complete backend platform: database, auth, storage, realtime, edge functions. For startups building no-code or full-stack apps, it's the single best choice.
PlanetScale is designed for teams that need MySQL at extreme horizontal scale, think millions of database writes per second. It's what you use when you've outgrown traditional database scaling, not when you're starting out.
For startups and scale-ups building no-code apps, Supabase. PlanetScale is for later-stage infrastructure engineers solving specific scale problems.
Hilfe bei der Entscheidung?
Unsere Experten haben 50+ Projekte mit diesen Tools gebaut.
Jetzt Beratung anfragen