Make vs Zapier in 2026: Which Automation Tool for Your Business? (DE)
Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier dominate no-code automation. The right choice depends entirely on how complex your workflows are.
Vergleich: Make vs Zapier
| Kriterium | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Flowchart (handles complex branching) | Linear steps (simple triggers) |
| Complexity | Handles complex multi-path logic | Better for simple trigger→action |
| Pricing Model | Per operation (cheaper at volume) | Per task (more expensive at scale) |
| Free Tier | 1,000 ops/mo | 100 tasks/mo |
| Integrations | 1,500+ apps | 6,000+ apps (more connectors) |
| Data Manipulation | Full (arrays, iterators, aggregators) | Basic (formatters only) |
| Error Handling | Built-in retry, custom routes | Basic error handling |
| Learning Curve | Moderate (flowchart thinking) | Very low (linear) |
Unser Urteil
Zapier is the right choice when: you need to connect two apps with a simple trigger and action, you want something working in 10 minutes, and automation volume is low.
Make is the right choice when: your automation has multiple paths, you need to process arrays of data, handle errors gracefully, or you're running high volumes where Zapier's per-task pricing gets painful.
At App Studio, we use Make for all complex automation workflows. The cost efficiency at scale and the ability to handle multi-step data manipulation is decisive. We use Zapier only for one-off simple connections.
Hilfe bei der Entscheidung?
Unsere Experten haben 50+ Projekte mit diesen Tools gebaut.
Jetzt Beratung anfragen